Posted by
Ron Devito on Monday, April 19, 2010 10:34:25 PM
The latest hit piece against SarahPAC originates from Sandra Fish, a
contributor to AOL Politics Daily. In this specimen, she rails against
SarahPAC's spending on consulting, travel, and photography fees, and
uses the PAC's routine disclosure filings in a lame attempt to build a
case that it is not fulfilling its mission. In her lead, Fish points to
20 targeted districts and complains that SarahPAC did not support or
endorse "favored candidates in those districts" (Fish, 2010, para. 1).
Calculus of Candidate Endorsements
The real world is not as simple as Fish makes it appear. Governor
Palin identified 20 incumbents she wants to see voted out of office.
That does not confer an obligation upon her to immediately identify the
names of those she would endorse and financially support to run against
them. In many districts, there may be contested primaries. Also, Gov.
Palin and SarahPAC are not in the business of squandering endorsements.
Even one losing endorsement can seriously deplete her political capital.
Her endorsements have to be winners. Mere agreement with political
values is necessary but insufficient to generate a winner. The candidate
must have a clean shot of winning, i.e. run an effective campaign.
Expenses, Revisited
Further, the serious money is needed later on in the election cycle.
SarahPAC has to leverage its endorsement money wisely. In my prior
entry on SarahPAC's expenses, I already addressed how I am
satisfied that the expenses incurred, are reasonable and customary. I
expressed my satisfaction with SarahPAC's handling of its expenses both
as a mid-range donor and as editor and publisher of a site that
routinely asks people to donate to the PAC.
All PACs Have High Administrative Overhead
Mitt
Romney's Free and Strong America PAC disbursed $52.4K to
candidates. It has substantial consulting and administrative expenses,
totalling over 20 times what was disbursed to candidates -- $1.226
million. HuckPAC
disbursed $13,500 to candidates and it too disbursed more than 20 times
that number in its administrative expenses - $270K. SarahPAC
disbursed $9.5K to candidates and had $393K in other expenses. Romney's
PAC raised $1.5 million; HuckPAC, $273K, and SarahPAC $400.5K.
There is nothing non-standard or untoward about SarahPAC's
disbursements. Those whose opinions matter on the subject of donations
to SarahPAC - the donors - have not lodged any complaints about how
SarahPAC conducts business.
Did Fish bother to read the disclosure reports for Romney's and
Huckabee's PAC's? Or is only SarahPAC the subject of Fish's fishing
expedition?
References:
Fish, S. (2010, April
19). "Sarah Palin's House Hit List: No Money to Favored Candidates So
Far." AOL Politics Daily. Retrieved April 19, 2010 from: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/19/sarah-palins-house-hit-list-no-money-to-favored-candidates-so/
Reports of Receipts
and Disbursements. Committee: Free and Strong America PAC. Federal
Election Commission. Retrieved April 19, 2010 from: http://images.nictusa.com/pdf/321/10930570321/10930570321.pdf#navpanes=0
Reports of Receipts
and Disbursements. Committee: HuckPAC. Federal Election Commission.
Retrieved April 19, 2010 from: http://images.nictusa.com/pdf/189/10990547189/10990547189.pdf#navpanes=0
Reports of Receipts
and Disbursements. Committee: Sarah PAC. Federal Election Commission.
Retrieved April 19, 2010 from: http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/552/10990533552/10990533552.pdf#navpanes=0